Search: Advanced | Preference

Traveling Boy means the travel adventures of the Traveiling Boitanos
Travel adventures of Wendy Koro Boitano
Travel adventures of Allan Smith Boitano
Travel adventures of Tamara Lelie Boitano
Travel adventures of Jim Friend Boitano
Travel adventures of Deb Roskamp Boitano
Travel adventures of Terry Cassel Boitano
Travel adventures of Joel Polinsky Boitano
Travel adventures of Jeff Fried Boitano
Travel adventures of Herb Chase Boitano
Travel adventures of Ringo Boitano
Travel adventures of Raoul Pascual Boitano
Travel adventures of Timothy Mattox Boitano
Travel adventures of Eric Anderson Boitano
Travel adventures of James Thomas Boitano
Travel adventures of John Clayton Boitano
Travel adventures of Brom Wikstrom Boitano
Travel adventures of a Boitano family friend


About Terry   write me

Terry Cassel: Oxford Debate
Oxford Town Revisted
The McCain Obama Debate
by Terry Cassel

"Oxford Town, Oxford Town
Ev'rybody's got their
heads bowed down
The sun don't shine above
the ground
Ain't a-goin' down to
Oxford Town

He went down to
Oxford Town
Guns and clubs followed
him down
All because his face
was brown
Better get away from
Oxford Town"

from "Oxford Town", Bob Dylan

 


here was substance, there was attitude, there were stark differences of opinion, but both candidates emerged unscathed. The first presidential debate of the 2008 campaign between Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama took place this past Friday evening, September 26, on the campus of the University of Mississippi in Oxford, MS. As I watched television shots of the surrounding community in the runup to the debate, I recalled a childhood visit to the school.

Growing up in the Sixties in northern Florida, I had opportunities to travel to many of the college campuses in the Deep South, and "Ole Miss" was certainly one of the most beautiful. The grounds were covered in lush green grass and punctuated with stately structures built originally in the middle of the 19th century. The common areas were thick with loblolly pines and magnolia trees dripping with Spanish moss. But when I was very young, an event in Oxford spurred my interest in politics, and began my engagement in political activism.

On September 30, 1962, white rioters killed four bystanders and hundreds were injured in a violent demonstration against the court-ordered integration of the university. James Meredith, a 23-year old black student, was blocked from entering his classroom building by the governor and university officials. When the rioting and mayhem began, the Mississippi Highway Patrol just stood back and watched. President Kennedy quickly ordered U.S. Marshalls to the scene to restore order and mobilized the U.S. Army in case more drastic intervention was needed. Meredith went on to graduate with his degree from Ole Miss, and integration began in earnest throughout the South.

Recently voted one of the top six college towns in America by USA Today, Oxford has come a long way since that day 46 years ago. Before 1962 no black person could walk freely on the Ole Miss campus, and now the nation's first African American candidate for president has been welcomed to debate there.

With a population of just 19,000, Oxford is a quintessential small southern college town, and it is a center for the arts in northern Mississippi. Bookstores and art galleries grace the tree-lined streets. Opera, the symphony and live theatre are ever present. But poverty and inequality still trouble most of rural Mississippi.

William Faulkner grew up in Oxford and called it home. Best-selling author John Grisham has a home there and attended the Ole Miss Art Center. The Meredith incident inspired Bob Dylan to write the memorable ballad "Oxford Town" more than 40 years ago.

But in 2008, Oxford has made a new place for itself in history - as host of the season's first presidential debate. Sparring over Iraq and the financial crisis, both Senators stayed close to their campaign rhetoric. As issues emerged, however, their opinions and policy stands became secondary to their physical presence on the stage. Each appeared ready to be president, but each presented the starkly different personalities they would bring to the job.

This was our third opportunity to see McCain and Obama in the harsh light of serious presidential consideration. The first was dissecting their decision-making processes and rationales for picking their running mates, and the actual selections of Sarah Palin and Joe Biden. The second was in their divergent responses to the economic crisis as it intensified in the days leading up to the debate. In the shadow of what might be the greatest financial crisis ever to strike at America's heart, McCain's behavior was generally considered erratic, while Obama was thought of as more cautious. And in Mississippi we saw their characters as they might perform on the world stage.

McCain was expected to be on steadier substantive ground with regard to the debate's thematic focus, foreign policy, and Obama was perceived to be the better orator. After a difficult week, and trailing in the polls, McCain had to restore confidence that he could maintain equilibrium in a crisis. McCain proved to be resolute and determined, and Obama showed he was smart and unflappable. But while they traded points on substance, they clashed more deeply on style.

Despite months of discussion of race and gender in this historic election, the real contest now seems to be one of generational divide. McCain, at 72 would be the oldest man ever elected to a first term. Obama is one of the youngest ever, at 47, to win a party's nomination. On the stage, a decisive, tough, cranky John McCain contrasted sharply with a thoughtful, graceful, polished Barack Obama. At times it seemed McCain was playing the role of aging patriarch of a powerful family, unwilling to let go of the reigns of control, and Obama playing the eldest son, feeling ready and eager to take charge and to take the family in a new direction.

Emotionally, McCain continually condescended to Obama, saying he "doesn't understand", calling him "naive", even "dangerous". Obama, despite the fact McCain refused to face or address him directly, looked at and spoke to McCain, often crediting McCain on issues. McCain, grumpy and grimacing, and Obama, smiling and engaging, are probably the reason a majority of people polled over the 48 hours following the conclusion of the debate felt McCain was "mean" and that Obama "won" the debate. It was a visceral reaction, not based on what the men said but more on how they said it.

Neither candidate committed a gaffe, and neither delivered a knockout punch. It showed that John McCain has a better than expected grasp of economic conditions that threaten America and that Barack Obama has the capacity to lead and be Commander-in-Chief. But this encounter was just the beginning, the opening round of three such meetings between these two candidates. There is much more to come, including a much-anticipated clash between vice presidential candidates.

Terry's Feedback

Great article, Terry Cassel. Balanced and articulate. We have until Nov 4 to sift through the glitz and image-making and make a serious choice baaed on the candidates' intelligence, character, experience, and stances on major issues such as the economy, foreign policy, and energy independence. The election will soon be upon us. Let's hope that, between now and then, the debate turns serious.

- Norman, Madison, WI

* * * *

Thank you, Norman, and well said.

Let's also hope the campaigns will show some respect to the voters and stop
the incessant dishonest attacks. This time around, let's not allow the hate
speech and fear-mongering dominate the agenda. Americans are growing weary
of being treated like fools.

- Terry

Terry,

Thanks bro, for another illuminating piece. You never cease to surprise me. Especially appreciated the link to Sarah Palin addressing the Wasalia Assembly of God. May everyone I forward it to watch it beginning to end and draw the same conclusions!

Your Boitano Sister, Citizen of the World

* * * *

Hello Sister,

Thanks for your "worldly" support. I, too, believe there are definite conclusions most folks will draw upon viewing that video.

- Terry

Hi Terry,

Nice article and refreshing to read such an unbiased view of what could be a visit back to happier and less complicated times of the 1940's and 50's. Back to the cold war period and back alley abortions. At least I'll have less difficulty shooting wolves and moose from a helicopter. My only concern is that when she's making important decisions that will effect the planet, will she know if the little voice inside her head telling her to go to war with Russia, will be God's or just another voice in her head.

Steve, Topanga, CA

Nice article, gives the appearance of impartiality. The fact of the matter is that those who don't think a governor is ready to be vice president, would prefer to elect a community organizer for the higher office of president, whom few can articulate what his accomplishments, if any, really are. I am biased, since Gov Palin and I share a similar alma mater and Christian faith. And I was born in Anchorage, too. What most aren't saying who are opposed to her, is they just don't want a Christian or gun-rights advocate, or pro-life person in office, so they say things like "she has no international foreign
policy experience" when I don't recall the same group complaining about that lack of experience when governor Clinton ran for president. Or governor Reagan for that matter.But we shall see what we shall see. There are obviously different world views animating each party, and I respect that they are sincerely held by both. (I just hope my side wins) :)

Chris, Boise, Idaho

* * * *

Thanks, Chris.

You make a good point about the issue of experience, especially in a vice presidential nominee. Voters will define experience in different ways.

I recall the foreign policy inexperience of Govs Carter, Reagan, Clinton and Bush, Jr. all being debated prior to their elections. But the issue is arguably less relevant for a vice presidential nominee.

Al Gore and Dick Cheney, each with extensive government and foreign policy experience, became powerful and influential vice presidents, ready to step in as president at a moment's notice. There's no reason Gov. Palin must follow that mold. Spiro Agnew and Dan Quayle were nominated, by Richard Nixon and George H. W. Bush respectively, simply to shore up a political base. This is a legitimate role. That's all some presidents expect their vice president to do.

Terry


Thank you for wonderfully thoughtful words on Gov Palin, beginning with that quote from T.S. Eliot.You are much more generous toward the lady in question than I am; in fact, generosity is not what I feel I need to muster up to make a decision about her worthiness as a candidate. I think she is a cruel joke played first on women; second, on the Democrats; and third,on this too to gullible country. I wish Karl Rove had remained at home in Texas, retired, but the Republicans could never let a mother lode like that go dormant.Bitter am I? --- guess so --- and will be so disappointed if this country doesn't give obama a chance to shine in its own eyes again as well as the eyes of the rest of the world.

P.S. re my comment on your earlier article, realize it wasn't friendly to wish you a trip to Beirut --- guess I was wishing you could visit the "old" Beirut for me!

Brenda, Richland, WA

* * * *

Brenda,

Many folks are unsure about Gov. Palin's readiness for the international stage. This includes quite a few Republicans I speak with as well. It is to be expected, inasmuch as she is virtually unknown outside Alaska and has only begun to be vetted by American voters and the press.

Over the next several weeks, as her handlers allow her to appear more often before the media, we may discover more about her. Meanwhile, the contest between McCain and Obama continues to heat up. Let's hope voters will cut through the lies and personal attacks and concentrate on the serious issues we face.

And, yes, I've never been to Beirut, but I know that at one time it was a safe, vibrant and beautiful cultural center.

Terry

Terry,

Good article. I see what you're saying about the majority of the nation not knowing who she is. Be that as it may, many are turned off by the current candidates whom we DO know. Several of my friends including myself have been disinterested with the campaign. Blame it on the mud slinging and that dirt thrown by the candidates and the media. Palin's surprise entry in the ring has actually revitalized many of us.

So far, depending on who you decide to listen to, her accomplishments in the short term she has been in office is better than that of Obama whose records are good in paper but has lacked substance. She has an approval rating of 80% among her Alaskan constituents which is better than most gevernors. Obama seems to be riding on promises more than accomplishments. Even his colleagues like Sen. Kirk Watson, are at a loss as to what he has really done.

If you are impartial to evangelical Christians, then she is definitely NOT your (wo)man. Here is a clip of her giving glory to God after giving birth to her baby.

At least you know where she stands. Some candidates are more conscious of what people want to hear than what they really believe in.

Here's a link to a blogger with aprehensions similar to yours. Click here.

Peter Paul of South Pasadena, CA

* * * *

Peter,

Thanks for your insights.

The Constitution guides my own biases about the vice presidency. Ultimately, the only stated duty of the vice president, besides being the tie-breaking vote in the Senate, is to step in as president should the president be unable to complete his or her duties as Commander-in-Chief. Any other tasks are assigned by the president as deemed fitting.

It's an issue of governance, yet many presidents choose running mates whom they believe will help them get elected, not help them govern. Of course there are no rules. It's a personal choice.

Selecting a running mate is the first real presidential decision a candidate will make. With Sen. Biden and Gov. Palin as the choices, I believe we have the first clear window into the thought processes, wisdom and judgment of our two candidates for president.

Terry

I liked the article on Palin. It tries to be impartial. Actually, there is much to recommend Palin. For one thing, she has revitalized the Republican party.

My main concern is "CAN SHE BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.? " Common sense tells me, (God Forbid!) that there is a big possibility that McCain may not be able to last his full term if elected. (Age, health) I do not believe Palin is qualified to be president.

Personally, I like McCain, and wouldn't mind if he gets elected. Between Obama and McCain, the citizens of U.S. have a good choice. Let the people speak. Here's the thing. I admire Biden too, and I believe he can easily step into the shoes of the presidency should something happen to Obama. I can't say the same for Palin. And after all, the main role of the VP is to be a stand-in for the presidency.

Henrietta, a US citizen residing in the Philippines

* * * *

Henrietta,

I appreciate your remarks. And I agree with you. I believe the country has a clear choice, and a good one, between Sens. McCain and Obama. At this point I also believe we have an even clearer choice between Gov. Palin and Sen. Biden.

Terry

Thanks, Terry, for letting me hop on your shoulders (in my imaginary travel, I'm light as a feather) and wander the streets of Istanbul with you. This mode of travel allows me to smell the smells, see the sites, as you describe, but avoid the crushing heat and humidity!

Most of all I enjoyed the wisdom of Mahir - his wonderfully simple declaration of being a Turk first and then a Muslim; his observation that Americans are children in this world. Only children could elect the biggest bully to its highest office and give him the keys to a closet full of horribly dangerous toys. One can only hope we'll grow up before we blow up.

Please travel to Beirut - another city I've always wanted to 'walk.'

Thanks for sharing.

Brenda Hughes
Richland, WA

I'm struck by how kind and civil the people were to you considering how much hostility (justified) that they have toward our government. It's refreshing to know that if Obama or Clinton becomes President he/she may be able to begin to heal these wounds and hopefully undo the Bush/Cheney damage and that because people of all faiths are good people, the damages don't have to be permanent.

p.s.

You make Istanbul sound like a great destination.

Roger Fallihee
Puyallup, WA


I so had to laugh at your conversation with Ali. Trying to be an open minded American abroad and having a political discussion can be a very frustrating experience. Now matter how open minded we can be, or how many points about our own country we willingly admit, it can be so tough getting others to do the same. They do seem to take any topic (such as the Armenian genocide) and just turn it back to us. "But what about all the bad things the US has done?" Yes, but...I already conceeded that. Can we talk about your country now? As I'm heading for uber-anti American Serbia in 3 weeks I'm going to keep your Istanbul experience in mind.

Ben Liu
Seattle, WA



Name: Required
E-mail: Required
City: Required
Feedback:
 

Stay tuned.


© TravelingBoy.com. All Rights Reserved. 2008.
This site is designed and maintained by WYNK Marketing. Send all technical issues to: support@wynkmarketing.com